Performance of Potassium Bicarbonate and Calcium Chloride Draw Solutions for Desalination of Saline Water Using Forward Osmosis

Document Type : Original Research Paper


1 Chemical Engineering Department, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, I.R. Iran

2 Chemical Technologies Department, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, I.R. Iran

3 Nanotechnology Reasearch Institute, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, I.R. Iran


Forward osmosis (FO) has recently drawn attention as a promising membrane based method for seawater and brackish water desalination. In this study, we focus on the use of calciun chloride (CaCl2) and potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) as inorganic salt draw solution candidates due to their appropriate performance in water flux and reverse salt diffusion as well as reasonable cost. The experiments were carried at 25 °C and cross-flow rate of 3 L min−1.  At the same osmotic pressure, the water flux of CaCl2 draw solution tested against deionized feed water, showed 20% higher permeation than KHCO3, which it was attributed to the lower internal concentration polarization (ICP). The reverse diffusion of CaCl2 was found higher than KHCO3 solution which it would be related to the smaller ionic size and the higher permeation of this salt through the membrane. The water flux for both draw solutions against 0.33 M NaCl feed solution was about 2.8 times lower than deionized feed water because of ICP. Higher concentrations of draw solution is required for increasing the water permeation from saline water feed towards the draw side.


[1] T.W. Kim, Y. Kim, C. Yun, H. Jang, W. Kim and S. Park, Systematic approach for draw solute selection and optimal system design for forward osmosis desalination, Desalination 11026 (2011) 1–8.
[2] C. H. Tan, H. Y. Ng, Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations, J. Membr. Sci 324 (2008) 209–219.
[3] B. Van der Bruggen, L. Lejon, C. Vandecasteele, Reuse, treatment, and discharge  of the concentrate of pressure-driven membrane processes, Environ. Sci. Technol 37 (2003) 3733–3738.
[4] J. R. McCutcheon, R. L. McGinnis, M. Elimelech, A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process, Desalination 174 (2005) 1–11.
[5] Y.J. Choi, J.S. Choi, H. J. Oh, S. Lee, D. R. Yang, J. H. Kim, Toward a combined system of forward osmosis and reverse osmosis for seawater desalination, Desalination 249 (2009) 239–246.
[6] Sh. Zhao, L. Zou, D. Mulcahy, Effects of membrane orientation on process performance in forward osmosis Applications, J Membr. Sci 382 (2011) 308–315.
[7] L. Liu, M. Wang, D. Wang, C.  Gao, Current Patents of Forward Osmosis Membrane Process, Recent Patents on Chem. Eng 2 (2009) 76–82.
[8] T.Y. Cath, A. E. Childress, M. Elimelech, Forward osmosis, Principles, applications, and recent developments, J. Membr. Sci 281 (2006) 70–87.
[9] G.W. Batchelder, US Patent No. 3,171,799 (1965).
[10] D.N. Glew, , US Patent No. 3,216,930 (1965).
[11] Frank, B.S., US Patent No. 3,670,897 (1972).
[12] J.O. Kessler, C.D. Moody, Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis, Desalination 18 (1976) 297–306.
[13] R.E. Kravath, J.A. Davis, Desalination of seawater by direct osmosis, Desalination 16 (1975) 151–155.
[14] R.L. McGinnis, US Patent No. 6,391,205 B1 (2002).
[15] J.R. McCutcheon, R.L. McGinnis, Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis, Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance, J. Membr. Sci 278 (2006) 114–123.
[16] A. Achilli, Y. Cath, E. Childress, Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications, J. Membr. Sci 364 (2010) 233–241.
[17] A. Tiraferri, N.Y. Yip, W.A. Phillip, J.D. Schiffman, M. Elimelech, Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure, J. Membr. Sci 367 (2011) 340–352.
[18] S. Chou, L. Shi, R. Wang, C.Y. Tang, C. Qiu A.G. Fane, Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane, Desalination 261 (2010) 365–372.
[19] Sh. Zhao, L. Zou, D. Mulcahy, Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute, Desalination 284 (2012) 175–181.
[20] OLI Stream Analyzer, OLI Systems Inc., Morris Plains, NJ,
[21] A. Bairami, B. Abtahi, Determination of salinity and main water ions in south-east of Caspian Sea, Ir. J. of Marine Sci 2 (2003) 2–3.
[22] Q. Ge, M. Ling, T.S. Chung, Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes, Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future, J.Membr. Sci 442 (2013) 225–237.
[23] N.Y. Yip, A. Tiraferri, W.A. Phillip, J.D. Schiffman, L.A. Hoover, Y.C. Kim, M. Elimelech: Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients, Environ. Sci. Technol 45 (2011) 4360–4369.
[24] B.S. Chanukya, S. Patil, N. K. Rastogi, Influence of concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis during desalination using ammonium bicarbonate, Desalination 312 (2013) 39–44.
[25] J.R. McCutcheon, M. Elimelech, Modeling water flux in forward osmosis, implications for improved membrane design, AICHE J 53 (2007) 1736–1744.
[26] M. Amini, M. Jahanshahi, A. Rahimpour, Synthesis of novel thin film nanocomposite (TFN) forward osmosis membranes using functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Membr. Sci 435 (2013) 233–241.
[27]    D. Emadzadeh, W.J. Lau, T.Matsuura, A.F. Ismail, M.Rahbari-Sisakht, Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization, J. Membr. Sci 449 (2014) 74–85.
[28] N.N. Bui, J.R. McCutcheon, Hydrophilic Nanofibers as New Supports for Thin Film Composite Membranes for Engineered Osmosis, Environ. Sci Technol 47 (2013) 1761–1769.